<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>The Digital Music Weblog</title>
<link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com</link>
<description>The Digital Music Weblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Blogsmith, LLC. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>Down with DRM roundup</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/18/down-with-drm-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/18/down-with-drm-roundup/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/18/down-with-drm-roundup/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a></p><div align="center"><img width="425" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="182" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/425px-mixing_board-2.jpg"  alt="" /><br /></div>
We're two weeks into the new year and, as of yet, the major label system hasn't collapsed under the weight of overwhelming demand for DRM free mp3 distribution. <br /><br />Pity, that. But we still have 50 weeks to go, and a pretty good collection of Mp3 positive signs. Here's a roundup of the Death to DRM press we've been reading. <br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/17/ap-looks-at-our-favorite-major-label-bully/">Our favorite major label bully is talking tough about his Apple re-negotiation</a>. He must realize his biggest ace in the hole is telling Jobs that Universal is ready to drop DRM?</li>
    <li><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/11/playsforsure-doomed-again/">PlaysForSure isn't dead</a>, but I'd hate to be on the hook for its medical bills</li>
    <li>"<em><a href="http://hypebot.typepad.com/hypebot/2007/01/ingrooves_ceo_r.html">For the past 5 years</a>, INgrooves has been distributing content from our independent clients to MP3 download stores because we, and our clients, know that DRM only frustrates the end    consumer.  If a music buyer wants to steal music they simply will, DRM or not</em>."  </li>
    <li>"<em>Under <a href="http://hypebot.typepad.com/hypebot/2007/01/who_needs_a_lab.html">a new deal with SnoCap</a>, ReverbNation.com users can now sell downloads through the site's DistroNow module. Under the arrangement, SNOCAP will handle the transaction with the consumer and the royalty payments to the digital rights holders.</em>"</li>
    <li><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/11/20/emusic-prepares-to-roll-over-100m-downloads-bnl-help-celebrate/">eMusic is the number 2 digital music retailer</a>, directly behind Apple's iTunes Store</li>
</ul>
<strong><em>So, don't worry Mp3. Just like mom told us in high-school; When you grow up, they'll all realize just how cool you've always been, and then they'll want to hang out with you, really. Now, who's mommy's carrot muffin cutie pie? That's right mp3.. you are</em></strong>.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/18/down-with-drm-roundup/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/738147/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/18/down-with-drm-roundup/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-18T09:20:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>RIAA as 17th Century French button maker</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/16/riaa-as-17th-century-french-button-maker/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/16/riaa-as-17th-century-french-button-maker/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/16/riaa-as-17th-century-french-button-maker/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/riaa/" rel="tag">RIAA</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="180" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/240px_cd_police.jpg"  alt="" />Ever think that there's never been an industry group in the history of man with the sort of bulldog spirited anti-competitive mindset of the RIAA? Think again. <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070110/004225.shtml">Techdirt draws an interesting parallel</a> between the RIAA of today, and French button makers of the 1700's. It seems tailors began making buttons out of dense cloth, which outraged the established button making industry, leading to the government imposition of strict fines on the cloth button makers, and some rather-paranoid tactics to ensure control of the market. <br /><br />"Shortly after the matter of cloth weaving has been disposed of, the button makers guild raises a cry of outrage; the tailors are beginning to make buttons out of cloth, an unheard-of thing. The government, indignant that an innovation should threaten a settled industry, imposes a fine on the cloth-button makers. But the <strong><em>wardens of the button guild are not yet satisfied. They demand the right to search people's homes and wardrobes and fine and even arrest them on the streets if they are seen wearing these subversive goods.</em></strong>"<br /><br />Looks like the RIAA's play book is a little less updated than we thought. <br /><br /><br /><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070110/004225.shtml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/16/riaa-as-17th-century-french-button-maker/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/736986/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/16/riaa-as-17th-century-french-button-maker/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-16T10:51:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Another DRM failure ; HD-DVD rip hits torrent trackers</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/15/another-drm-failure-hd-dvd-rip-hits-torrent-trackers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/15/another-drm-failure-hd-dvd-rip-hits-torrent-trackers/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/15/another-drm-failure-hd-dvd-rip-hits-torrent-trackers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="200" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/binary-240px.jpg"  alt="" />It isn't digital music but, it's a perfect example of how DRM isn't an effective method of keeping your content from the hands of pirates. <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2007/01/15/first-hd-dvd-rip-shows-up-online/">The first HD-DVD rip is available via Bittorrent</a>, ending any and all speculation about whether the HD-DVD's DRM format has been successfully cracked. <br /><br />Brad Linder of <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2007/01/15/first-hd-dvd-rip-shows-up-online/">Download Squad writes</a>, "The breakthrough came when members of the Doom9 Forum tracked down several unique memory keys that BackupHDDVD needs in order to decrypt HD-DVDs. Apparently the keys for King Kong and 12 Monkeys are also available, although Serenity appears to be the only movie to have made it online so far."<br /><br />The point? Even the most advanced DRM available isn't effective against piracy and, if DRM isn't effective against piracy it serves as nothing more than a way to control the legal use of rightfully purchased media. Have the urge to build a better media player? You can't, unless you first pay royalties to the DRM licence-owners to legally decrypt the content stored within. Have an idea for a media player that makes those DRM license-owners a little nervous? (i.e. playing back your legally purchased content on a non-blessed Linux?) You won't be getting a license for love or money. It's just that simple.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/15/another-drm-failure-hd-dvd-rip-hits-torrent-trackers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/736294/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/15/another-drm-failure-hd-dvd-rip-hits-torrent-trackers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-15T11:57:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Atlantic Monthly : Mp3 = VHS / DRM = Betamax</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/12/atlantic-monthly-mp3-vhs-drm-betamax/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/12/atlantic-monthly-mp3-vhs-drm-betamax/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/12/atlantic-monthly-mp3-vhs-drm-betamax/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/general/" rel="tag">General</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/riaa/" rel="tag">RIAA</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/ifpi/" rel="tag">IFPI</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/bpi/" rel="tag">BPI</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/itunes/" rel="tag">iTunes</a></p><img width="203" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="149" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/_41869670_cdlaptop_203b.jpg"  alt="" />Michael Hirchshorn of <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200701/hirschorn-radio">The Atlantic Monthly takes a look at Web 2.0 music services</a> and while drawing lines though a connect the dots progression comes up with several gems of inference. The highlight of which is a comparison of Mp3 to DRM "protected" media that contrasts VHS and Betamax, "<font class="arttype">One next step could be a move by the labels to make more pay-per-download music available without restriction, meaning that once you've purchased a song, you can do anything you want with it, currently a no-go on Zune or iTunes. Unrestricted MP3 sites could play VHS to iTunes's Betamax. However it occurs, though, the execution of a widely used free and free-flowing music download and sharing system is surely imminent."<br /><br />Coolfer was <a href="http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2007/01/the_digitalmusi.php">struck by the same quote</a>, and asks not "if" but "when" this whole magical convergence of factors will result in the reiterated statement, "</font><font class="arttype">everything will eventually become available everywhere for a price that will approach zero</font><font class="arttype">" will become fact rather than lore.  We're already on record as saying DRM will die, so <em><strong>where and when can we expect the fiery crash and burn which we all agree is inevitable? </strong></em></font><em><strong><font class="arttype">I wanna bring marshmallows and watch the flames.</font></strong></em><font class="arttype" /><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200701/hirschorn-radio>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/12/atlantic-monthly-mp3-vhs-drm-betamax/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/735148/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/12/atlantic-monthly-mp3-vhs-drm-betamax/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-12T16:43:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>PlaysForSure doomed, again</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/11/playsforsure-doomed-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/11/playsforsure-doomed-again/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/11/playsforsure-doomed-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/creative/" rel="tag">Creative</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/microsoft/" rel="tag">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/sandisk/" rel="tag">Sandisk</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/napster/" rel="tag">Napster</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/rhapsody/" rel="tag">Rhapsody</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/real-networks/" rel="tag">Real Networks</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/yahoo-music/" rel="tag">Yahoo! Music</a></p><img width="250" vspace="8" hspace="8" height="200" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/microsoft-logo.jpg"  alt="" />The grapevine says some at CES are being told Microsoft will no longer develop PlaysForSure, its proprietary DRM system, a move Microsoft swore up and down it would never make when the company failed to include PlaysForSure support in the Zune line. <br /><br />According to <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/101706/music-stores-face-closure-of-microsoft-drm-programme-reports.html">PC Pro News</a>,"Microsoft will concentrate exclusively on its Zune platform, which is not compatible with PlaysForSure. Microsoft has neither confirmed or denied the reports, which draw on comments made by an executive for one unnamed music service and have been confirmed by others in the industry. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has said that he expects PlaysForSure to continue, although he has explained that Zune was conceived because the PlaysForSure approach had failed to dent Apple's dominance of digital music."<br /><br />And just when Napster was starting to show <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/04/think-playsforsure-is-dead-dont-tell-napster/">new signs of traction</a>. It's unclear yet what all this means for the many PlaysForSure partner companies but, the end of development could put them all in a very precarious place. This could be a good thing for some, as Real Networks and Sandisk seemed to see this coming a while ago, and have created a new, competing subscription-capable DRM format. <br /><br />See Also:<br /><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/04/think-playsforsure-is-dead-dont-tell-napster/">Think PlaysForSure is dead? Don't tell Napster</a><br /><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/09/18/real-networks-and-sandisk-hook-up/">Real Networks and Sandisk hook up</a><br /><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/11/07/bbc-catches-on-to-playforsure-lockout-on-zune/">BBC catches on to PlayForSure lockout on Zune</a><br /><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/27/microsoft-prepared-for-long-haul-and-big-investment-in-zune/">Microsoft prepared for long haul and big investment in Zune</a><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/101706/music-stores-face-closure-of-microsoft-drm-programme-reports.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/11/playsforsure-doomed-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/734228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/11/playsforsure-doomed-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-11T16:45:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Hypebot asks indie labels about DRM</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/10/hypebot-asks-indie-labels-about-drm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/10/hypebot-asks-indie-labels-about-drm/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/10/hypebot-asks-indie-labels-about-drm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/general/" rel="tag">General</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/riaa/" rel="tag">RIAA</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="246" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/drm3.jpg"  alt="" />Bruce at <a href="http://hypebot.typepad.com/hypebot/2007/01/beggars_adam_fa.html">Hypebot</a> has been an an anti-DRM rampage in the new year. He's started contacting industry figures and asking them a few questions each about how they view the Mp3, and on the flipside of the coin, DRM. <br /><br />His most recent <strike>victim</strike> target is Director of New Media for Beggar's/Matador Adam Farrell. Wanna know what Beggar's position is on Mp3 downloads? "At the end of the day, we support any steps that a DMS or device company or label might take to reduce friction in the market and improve the customer experience."<br /><br />It's an avalanche waiting to happen. If nothing else, the labels are all exceptionally competitive. Once a few start mp3 distribution, opening themselves up to new possibilities online and (in my estimation) increasing their digital sales by sharp margins, the rest will be forced to follow. Frankly, I believe that for the most part, <strong><em>the labels know full well that DRM isn't working</em></strong>, only they've painted themselves into a rhetorical corner over the last few years and, no one ever wants to be the first one to eat crow.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/10/hypebot-asks-indie-labels-about-drm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/733578/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/10/hypebot-asks-indie-labels-about-drm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-10T15:45:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Grooveshark announces pay-2-peer</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/09/grooveshark-announces-pay-2-peer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/09/grooveshark-announces-pay-2-peer/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/09/grooveshark-announces-pay-2-peer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="240" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/240px-grooveshark.jpg"  alt="" />What happens when P2P meets Pay-To-Play? Grooveshark, apparently. The just announced service will combine P2P distribution and Web 2.0 style crowdsourcing .<br /><br />According to the press release, <a href="http://www.grooveshark.com/">Grooveshark</a> will function much like popular P2P file exchanges. Members will be able to offer their media library for sale through Grooveshark and discover and share new music with other members (only MP3 or OGG files without DRM). The difference: <em>Grooveshark will broker music transactions by charging up to 99 cents for each song downloaded</em> and use those proceeds to pay royalties to the copyright holders and reward members for community participation.<br /><br />It remains to be seen how serious of a proposition GrooveShark will be. The selection will no doubt be limited by their decision to eschew DRM, but the concept itself is pretty sharp. We'll definitely be keeping an eye on Grooveshark as they work to launch their new baby.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/01-09-2007/0004502424&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/09/grooveshark-announces-pay-2-peer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/732701/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/09/grooveshark-announces-pay-2-peer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Grooveshark</category><category>P2P</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-09T15:35:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>EMI abandons CD DRM</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/09/emi-abandons-cd-drm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/09/emi-abandons-cd-drm/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/09/emi-abandons-cd-drm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="200" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/emi.jpg"  alt="" />We're stumbling in little baby steps towards the end of mainstream DRM. EMI announced that every single CD it sells from now on will be free of DRM, and thus open to personal format shifting, such as the world should be. <br /><br />Cory Doctorow of Boing Boing <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/01/08/emi_abandons_cd_drm.html">writes</a>, "I remember just a few years ago when an EMI customer-service rep sent an email to an irate customer promising that every CD in Europe would have DRM within a decade."<br /><br />EMI seems to have wisened up quite a bit over the last year, dipping its toes in the DRM free waters of mp3 distribution and generally learning how not to be Universal Music Group. Kudos to EMI on a practical decision that more labels should be making. The other majors should pay attention, lest they find themselves playing catch-up to a hip new EMI by year's end. <br /><br />See also:<br /><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/07/the-first-week-of-2007-in-review/">The first week of 2007 in review</a><br /><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/07/drm-free-nora-jones-song-on-emusic-and-yahoo/">DRM-free Nora Jones song on eMusic and Yahoo!</a><br /><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/04/major-label-to-take-mp3-plunge-but-who/">Major label to take mp3 plunge, but who?</a><br /><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/11/29/emi-experimenting-with-drm-less-mp3s/">EMI experimenting with DRM-less mp3s?</a><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boingboing.net/2007/01/08/emi_abandons_cd_drm.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/09/emi-abandons-cd-drm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/732590/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/09/emi-abandons-cd-drm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>cd drm</category><category>CdDrm</category><category>EMI</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-09T11:20:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Eulogizing the CD, the ills of disposable music</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/08/eulogizing-the-cd-the-ills-of-disposable-music/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/08/eulogizing-the-cd-the-ills-of-disposable-music/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/08/eulogizing-the-cd-the-ills-of-disposable-music/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/general/" rel="tag">General</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/riaa/" rel="tag">RIAA</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/ifpi/" rel="tag">IFPI</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/bpi/" rel="tag">BPI</a></p><img width="203" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="149" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/_41869670_cdlaptop_203b.jpg"  alt="" />"The CD as it stands is dead", that's what Alain Levy of EMI told a packed room at London School of Business in October (Lomax's article says different but, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/10/30/the-cd-is-dead-long-live-digital/">we checked</a>). John Nova Lomax of <a href="http://houstonpress.com/Issues/2007-01-04/news/feature.html">Houston Press</a> is taking the time to eulogize it, examine why it's dying and take a cursory look at where the format is heading. <br /><br />Lomax <a href="http://houstonpress.com/Issues/2007-01-04/news/feature.html">writes</a>, "Looking back over the past 45 years, it is now plain that the move from vinyl to CD was not the bold step forward we were told it would be. CDs were not scratch-proof (as the labels had us believe early on), nor was the sound an improvement on vinyl -- indeed, most audiophiles argue that their sound is inferior. Jewel cases were ridiculously brittle -- they were rendered useless by a drop of four feet or so -- and they were hard to open, as were the huge and idiotic long-boxes CDs were packaged in well into the 1990s. Their visual appeal was almost always minimal and yet they took up what now seems like a lot of shelf space."<br /><br />The truth is the CD, due to its fragility, has become a disposable item. One hipster quips in Lomax's article that she treats her music burned to CD with the same dismissive regard as she would treat any disposable lighter. As a culture, we're plenty fed up with disposable items which are sold to us as a "semi-durable" good. We know we'll be back to replace it far to early, and we feel ripped off when we find ourselves back in line again, holding a package full of the same empty promises we bought last time.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://houstonpress.com/Issues/2007-01-04/news/feature.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/08/eulogizing-the-cd-the-ills-of-disposable-music/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/731870/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/08/eulogizing-the-cd-the-ills-of-disposable-music/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Alain Levy</category><category>AlainLevy</category><category>cd</category><category>CD eulogy</category><category>CdEulogy</category><category>EMI</category><category>music business</category><category>MusicBusiness</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-08T16:36:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>The first week of 2007 in review</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/07/the-first-week-of-2007-in-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/07/the-first-week-of-2007-in-review/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/07/the-first-week-of-2007-in-review/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/microsoft/" rel="tag">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/riaa/" rel="tag">RIAA</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/bpi/" rel="tag">BPI</a></p><div align="center"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://news.netscape.com/embed/430/IYASBLOKKMXUMGCNZUIQ"></script><br /></div>
<br /> <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/07/the-first-week-of-2007-in-review/">A video look at the Digital Music highlights from the first week of 2007</a>. Featuring music from <a href="http://ccmixter.org/media/files/ollie77/8165">The Blackhorse Remix Project featuring Musetta</a>. <br /><br />There's also a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmIR3sAU66c">YouTube version</a>.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/07/the-first-week-of-2007-in-review/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/731070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/07/the-first-week-of-2007-in-review/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>black eyed peas</category><category>BlackEyedPeas</category><category>fergie</category><category>ipod</category><category>riaa</category><category>zune</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-07T17:25:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Cringely says DRM doomed in 2007, so is Zune</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/06/cringely-says-drm-doomed-in-2007-so-is-zune/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/06/cringely-says-drm-doomed-in-2007-so-is-zune/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/06/cringely-says-drm-doomed-in-2007-so-is-zune/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/microsoft/" rel="tag">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/riaa/" rel="tag">RIAA</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/emusic/" rel="tag">eMusic</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="236" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/robert-x-cringely.jpg" />This year will see ecosystem changing digital music milestones, if Robert X. Cringely's crystal ball is working properly. In his 2007 predictions Cringely writes, "No one DRM technology emerges as the winner and the RIAA begins to back off as it loses a few legal cases. Still, no Internet-only song wins a Grammy or is even recognized as existing." He also turns his six-shooter of prognostication on Apple's unibrow baby wanna-be, "Zune 2.0 appears, isn't brown, but still nobody buys it."<br /><br />Cringely's predictions give us something to think about. I've already gone on record as saying <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/big-boulder-of-mp3-set-to-overtake-music-business-in-2007/">DRM is deadmeat in 2007</a> and, I think he's certainly within reason to believe the RIAA will eventually tire of its endless stream of litigation. What I think the RIAA won't do is end one strategy without starting another, so look for signs of a new direction in "piracy management." <strong><em><br /><br />Let's face it, piracy isn't going to shrivel up and die, but will be managed like a chronic disease, rather than through a frantic hacking off of limbs</em>. </strong><br /><br />As for the Zune, I don't think it matters. Zune 2.0 or not the only thing that will displace Apple as top dog in the digital music marketplace is the end of DRM for mainstream, major label music. The death of DRM would make major changes in the hardware ecosystem possible, as manufacturers compete for eardrums and eyeballs on a level playing field. Apple's DRM has the labels stuck in a very tight place, and there is every reason to believe that deep within the darkest layers of the RIAA's war room there is a sincere desire to break free from Apple's bonds. <br /><br />As for an internet only song winning a Grammy, as long as the Recording Academy members are exclusively members of the "club", I think it's safe to say that the Grammy awards won't see any internet party crashers invited to the dance. That's just simple logic.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070105_001440.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/06/cringely-says-drm-doomed-in-2007-so-is-zune/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/730470/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/06/cringely-says-drm-doomed-in-2007-so-is-zune/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>anti-drm</category><category>apple</category><category>iPod</category><category>mp3</category><category>Robert X. Cringely</category><category>RobertX.Cringely</category><category>tech industry</category><category>tech predictions</category><category>TechIndustry</category><category>TechPredictions</category><category>zune</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-06T13:36:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Major label to take mp3 plunge, but who?</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/04/major-label-to-take-mp3-plunge-but-who/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/04/major-label-to-take-mp3-plunge-but-who/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/04/major-label-to-take-mp3-plunge-but-who/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="200" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/emi.jpg" />There are <a href="http://digitalmusicnews.com/stories/010307mp3/view">rumors</a> <a href="http://hypebot.typepad.com/hypebot/2007/01/music_industry_.html">flying</a> <a href="http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2007/01/thursday_mornin_43.php">that </a>one of the big four is set to release a significant portion of their catalog in DRM-free mp3 format, which means that somewhere in label-land, someone finally managed to get their medication all straightened out. The big question is, who?<br /><br />Glenn Coolfer <a href="http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2007/01/thursday_mornin_43.php">writes</a>, "I don't know which label it will be, but I'd bet against it being from Universal Music Group. Doug Morris experiment with MP3? That would be a shocker." Coolfer is spot on; there isn't enough thread in the world to sew up the generation gap between Doug Morris' <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/11/30/universal-musics-doug-morris-phone-phreak/">megalomania-cal psyche</a> and where the music business is actually headed. <br /><br />Digital Music News says, "Just which label will pull the trigger is unclear, though EMI has been in an experimental mood." My money is on EMI as well. As I wrote recently about EMI, "You're <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/11/29/emi-experimenting-with-drm-less-mp3s/">sassy</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/07/drm-free-nora-jones-song-on-emusic-and-yahoo/">experimental</a> and, frankly, my favorite of the major labels."<br /><br />Bruce Houghton <a href="http://hypebot.typepad.com/hypebot/2007/01/music_industry_.html">all but confirms that EMI is the label in question</a>, "Were hearing both from the US and abroad that EMI that is preparing to release some of its major catalog as DRM free mp3's."<br /><br />So, is this the start of the DRM free Amazon catalog we've been hearing about? It might be. Frankly, it's about time. DRM will never stop those who desire to pirate music, and does little else aside from frustrating legitimate customers. <br /><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/04/major-label-to-take-mp3-plunge-but-who/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/729311/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/04/major-label-to-take-mp3-plunge-but-who/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>coolfer</category><category>EMI</category><category>hypebot</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-04T14:38:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Jamendo breaks 2000 album mark, still going strong</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/jamendo-breaks-2000-album-mark-still-going-strong/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/jamendo-breaks-2000-album-mark-still-going-strong/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/jamendo-breaks-2000-album-mark-still-going-strong/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/new-artists/" rel="tag">New Artists</a></p>Light on cash after the holidays but looking for new music anyway? Jamendo has a great solution. We've mentioned Jamendo before but, they've <a href="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7175">just hit another milestone</a> on their way to free music dominance. Now, over 2000 albums and counting can be downloaded for free, legally (yes, legally.. ) from <a href="http://www.jamendo.com/en/">Jamendo's catalog</a>. <br /><br />
<div align="center"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/jamendo_chart.jpg" /><br /></div>
<br />The chart shows the meteoric rise of Jamendo over the last 2 years. They've also launched some new features since the last time we took a look, such as transparent artist donations and the ability to <a href="http://www.jamendo.com/en/?p=search&amp;search_string=sonic%20youth&amp;search_categ=xartist">find music similar to that of any artist</a> which make Jamendo a strong contender among a sea of Web 2.0 start-ups. <br /><br />Congrats to Jamendo on busting through the two thousand album mark, keep up the great work guys! We've found a few great artists through Jamendo including <a href="http://www.jamendo.com/en/artist/tryad/">Tryad</a>, <a href="http://www.jamendo.com/en/artist/revolutionvoid/">Revolution Void</a>, <a href="http://www.jamendo.com/en/artist/shex/">Shex</a> and <a href="http://www.jamendo.com/en/artist/zeropage/">Zeropage</a>.<br /><br />[via <a href="http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7175">Creative Commons</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/jamendo-breaks-2000-album-mark-still-going-strong/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/727916/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/jamendo-breaks-2000-album-mark-still-going-strong/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>Creative Commons</category><category>CreativeCommons</category><category>Jamendo</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-02T15:32:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Magnatune in Six</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/magnatune-in-six/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/magnatune-in-six/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/magnatune-in-six/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/general/" rel="tag">General</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/riaa/" rel="tag">RIAA</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/new-artists/" rel="tag">New Artists</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/must-hear/" rel="tag">Must Hear</a></p>I've often mentioned Magantune as an example of an upstart company doing things the right way. <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/magnatune-in-six/">This</a> is another great example. A <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/magnatune-in-six/">six minute video</a> explaining how Magnatune works (non-exclusive contracts, 50/50 split with artists, etc) and showcasing just a few artists from Magnatune's stable. <br /><br /><object width="425" height="350">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zvEEgQSU3WA" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><embed width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zvEEgQSU3WA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></embed></object><br /><br />Featuring interview segments with Artemis, DJ Markitos, Mija and Jan Hanford of Human Response, the six minute video touches on the differences between Magnatune and the majors, the diversity of music at Magnatune, and the fan to artist interaction that comes with a growing net-centric label.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/magnatune-in-six/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/727902/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/magnatune-in-six/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>drm free</category><category>DrmFree</category><category>Magnatune</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-02T13:34:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Big boulder of mp3 set to overtake music business in 2007</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/big-boulder-of-mp3-set-to-overtake-music-business-in-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/big-boulder-of-mp3-set-to-overtake-music-business-in-2007/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/big-boulder-of-mp3-set-to-overtake-music-business-in-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/riaa/" rel="tag">RIAA</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/emusic/" rel="tag">eMusic</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="200" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2007/01/mp3icon.gif" />Hear that rumbling sound? It's a giant boulder of DRM-less Mp3 goodness barreling down on the music industry like that scene in <em>Raiders of The Lost Arc</em>. <br /><br />To kick off the year in fine mp3 positive fashion, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070102/wr_nm/digital_dc">Reuters reports</a> on a string of news coming from all corners of the music biz. The two current "Biggies" are: <br />
<ul>
    <li>Former EMI exec Ted Cohen has been hired by a post-lawsuit Limewire to convince labels they can "start charging its 40 million users $1 per download and share the revenue and user-behavior information with the music industry." According to the article Limewire wants this to be a DRM-free experiment. </li>
    <li>Amazon is pushing for a DRM free entry into the digital music market</li>
</ul>
Add to the equation the supporting evidence provided by eMusic's recent 100 Million track milestone and Mp3 experiments from EMI and Yahoo! Music and the only question remaining is; Will the RIAA member labels be able to deftly maneuver around this speeding boulder or, will it overtake them?<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/big-boulder-of-mp3-set-to-overtake-music-business-in-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/727840/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2007/01/02/big-boulder-of-mp3-set-to-overtake-music-business-in-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>drm free mp3</category><category>DrmFreeMp3</category><category>mp3</category><category>no drm</category><category>NoDrm</category><category>year of the mp3</category><category>YearOfTheMp3</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-01-02T11:24:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Mp3 format as major label cure</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/29/mp3-format-as-major-label-cure/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/29/mp3-format-as-major-label-cure/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/29/mp3-format-as-major-label-cure/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/general/" rel="tag">General</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/emusic/" rel="tag">eMusic</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="200" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/12/mp3icon.gif"  alt="" />An <a href="http://www.forbes.com/digitalentertainment/2006/12/28/emusic-mp3-itunes-tech-media-cx_lh_1228music.html">interview with Bob Kohn</a> (co-founder of eMusic and the man who <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Kohn-on-Music-Licensing-Al/dp/073551447X">wrote the book on music licensing</a>) in Forbes  gets to the core of what Kohn thinks of DRM and the digital music market, "When the majors told us in my eMusic days that they wouldn't sell their recordings in MP3 format, I would say, 'You already are--you're selling CDs, and you can turn them into MP3 files.' If they [drop DRM] today, you will see a tremendous increase in digital download sales, because then you will finally see some good competition to iTunes."<br /><br />eMusic's popularity has done a great deal for the credibility of the mp3 as a distribution format, and <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/18/amazon-enters-mp3-market/">Amazon's new entry</a> should do still more but we've still got a long way to go. It's encouraging to see Mp3 positive language in a publication like Forbes but, we need a <em>full court press on the labels</em> to make <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/26/2007-the-year-of-the-mp3/">2007 the year of the Mp3</a>. Music fans and musicians need to step up and demand that the majors give us music in the format we want. <br /><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/29/mp3-format-as-major-label-cure/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/726411/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/29/mp3-format-as-major-label-cure/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>year of the mp3</category><category>YearOfTheMp3</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-29T12:46:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Where's the ad supported P2P?</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/28/wheres-the-ad-supported-p2p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/28/wheres-the-ad-supported-p2p/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/28/wheres-the-ad-supported-p2p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/general/" rel="tag">General</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="186" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/12/spiralfrog-240px.jpg"  alt="" />Remember <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/08/30/is-spiralfrog-an-end-run-around-royalty-payments/">SpiralFrog</a>? Or how about Qtrax?  Both of these ad supported P2P services have been scheduled to make their debut but have so far failed to leave the starting gate. Both companies, as well as the previously announced and delayed Mashboxx, are aiming to start delivering DRM mangled and advertising supported music in the new year but, will they? <br /><br />Qtrax has been on and off the table since 2004, Mashboxx had planned its original launch in 2005 and newcomer SpiralFrog had hoped to be live this month but, between the three of them no one has been able to bring the supposed ad based free-for-all panacea to market. Forbes offers a quick run down but, stops short of offering any real answers as to why these three are still prepping the launch pad. <br /><br />Glenn Coolfer <a href="http://www.coolfer.com/blog/archives/2006/12/adsupported_p2p.php">takes a shot at the "why"</a>, "The companies' delays are fitting given consumer hesitancy to engage their business models. If anything has been learned over the last few years, it is that consumers want to own their music. Subscription services and the idea of "renting" music have not broken into the mainstream. The three mentioned companies have different approaches but face the same problems of value proposition."<br /><br />I'm with Coolfer when it comes to pointing out lackluster consumer acceptance but, the ad based P2P companies don't really know yet what will or won't fly. I'm anxiously awaiting the day that one of these ad based comers makes their real debut. A strong offering from any one of the three will finally lay to rest the question of whether this ad supported model can gain any traction.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/28/wheres-the-ad-supported-p2p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/725999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/28/wheres-the-ad-supported-p2p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>ad supported p2p</category><category>AdSupportedP2p</category><category>mashboxx</category><category>qtrax</category><category>spiralfrog</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-28T17:18:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>2007: The year of the Mp3</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/26/2007-the-year-of-the-mp3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/26/2007-the-year-of-the-mp3/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/26/2007-the-year-of-the-mp3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/general/" rel="tag">General</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/riaa/" rel="tag">RIAA</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/emusic/" rel="tag">eMusic</a></p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="145" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/12/drm2.jpg" />This year we saw <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/11/29/emi-experimenting-with-drm-less-mp3s/">several</a> <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/07/drm-free-nora-jones-song-on-emusic-and-yahoo/">DRM free</a> <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/07/20/yahoo-offers-drm-free-download/">experiments</a> from the major labels. 2007 can be "<em>The Year of The Mp3</em>," the year unencrypted, DRM free mp3s revive, rather than raze the music business but, you and I have to stand up together and yell loudly in order for the dream to come true. <br /><br />As we get ready to bid a fond farewell to 2006, I've been doing some thinking; It's high-time we as digital music consumers make our desires clear.<br />
<ul>
    <li><strong>We want DRM free music. </strong></li>
    <li><strong>We aren't thieves. </strong></li>
    <li><strong>We're willing to pay, if you give us what we want.</strong> </li>
</ul>
It really is that simple. eMusic has proven this year that the mp3 is a viable media format, without any crippling DRM layer applied. The continued growth of P2P, even after a slew of lawsuits, settlements and unhappy PR moments also proves that DRM isn't saving anyone from anything.. and most certainly isn't protecting music from piracy. <br /><br />It's time for the record execs to give up the flimsy arguments that have boxed them into a corner so deep they're unable to see the light at the other end of the room. Mp3 is here to stay, it's nothing to be afraid of and, if the record labels would just treat us like adults, everyone would be much better off.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/26/2007-the-year-of-the-mp3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/724294/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/26/2007-the-year-of-the-mp3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>2007</category><category>anti-drm</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-26T04:05:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>iPod meets blender or, how not to care for your iPod</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/22/ipod-meets-blender-or-how-not-to-care-for-your-ipod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/22/ipod-meets-blender-or-how-not-to-care-for-your-ipod/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/22/ipod-meets-blender-or-how-not-to-care-for-your-ipod/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/general/" rel="tag">General</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/apple/" rel="tag">Apple</a></p><center><object width="425" height="350">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/B8H29jU8Wrs" name="movie" />
<param value="transparent" name="wmode" /><embed width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/B8H29jU8Wrs"></embed></object></center><br /><br />Ever wanted to know what happens when a first gen iPod meets an industrial blender? Neither have we but, that didn't stop <a href="http://www.willitblend.com/">these guys</a> from giving it a shot. <br /><br />It's a bit of an extreme way to make the point that you <em>really </em>want a new iPod for Christmas isn't it?<br /><br />[via <a href="http://www.yourstandardlife.com/2006/12/will_it_blend_ipod.html">Your Standard Life</a>]<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/22/ipod-meets-blender-or-how-not-to-care-for-your-ipod/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/723639/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/22/ipod-meets-blender-or-how-not-to-care-for-your-ipod/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>destruction</category><category>Funny</category><category>iPod</category><category>willitblend</category><category>yourstandardlife</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-22T16:30:00+00:00</dc:date></item><item><title>Passalong's first "FreedomMp3" store opens</title><link>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/22/passalongs-first-freedommp3-store-opens/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/22/passalongs-first-freedommp3-store-opens/</guid><comments>http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/22/passalongs-first-freedommp3-store-opens/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/news/" rel="tag">News</a>, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/category/drm/" rel="tag">DRM</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="212" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/media/2006/12/240px-freedom_mp3.jpg"  alt="" />Passalong Networks first "FreedomMp3" based online music store has <a href="http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=197754">opened in the form of FaithMp3</a>, a <a href="http://faithmp3.passalong.com/P-1999999450/C-1999998720/eChannel.isl">Christian music catalog</a>. Passalong's technology , "<span>create[s] a service that honors both creator and consumer rights by allowing the use of any file format and providing a secure environment on the device so that consumers can move their music within their domain (their iPods, computers, etc.) while protecting the creator's rights by not allowing the files to be uploaded to P2P services or mass copied and stolen.</span>"<br /><br />Essentially what Passalong does is wrap the Mp3 in a layer of encryption, using resident software to decide when and if decryption will be allowed and the unencrypted result passed on to the host application or device. Frankly, this is uninspiring technology which only seeks to play nursemaid to the nervous copyright holders, while offering no real protection from piracy. "Cracking" a FreedomMp3 protected file would be a simple matter of acknowledging the request to transfer the unencrypted file to an Mp3 based playback device, and then copying the unencrypted result back to a PC. <br /><br />Meanwhile, <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/13/emusic-crosses-100m-mark/">eMusic is rockin along selling unencrypted Mp3s</a> and putting freedom and trust in the hands of customers, while <a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/18/amazon-enters-mp3-market/">Amazon prepares to do the same</a>. When will the publishers learn? Adding a layer of inconvenience to your product doesn't protect anyone from anything.<h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/22/passalongs-first-freedommp3-store-opens/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/forward/723601/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://digitalmusic.weblogsinc.com/2006/12/22/passalongs-first-freedommp3-store-opens/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a><br />]]></description><category>faithmp3</category><category>freedommp3</category><category>passalong</category><dc:creator>Grant Robertson</dc:creator><dc:date>2006-12-22T13:45:00+00:00</dc:date></item></channel></rss>